Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 1997 54(4):645-653; doi:10.1006/jmsc.1997.0242
© 1997 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamer, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hamer, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Spatial variation in the feeding ecology, foraging ranges, and breeding energetics of northern fulmars in the north-east Atlantic Ocean

K. C. Hamer, D. R. Thompson and C. M. Gray

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, England, UK
Applied Ornithology Unit, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.

Correspondence to K. C. Hamer: tel: +441913743355; fax: +441913742417; email: k.c.hamer{at}durham.ac.uk

Northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) are one of the most abundant birds in the North Atlantic Ocean and the two largest fulmar colonies in the UK are at St Kilda, Outer Hebrides and Foula, Shetland. These colonies are about 450 km apart and surrounded by waters that differ greatly in terms of potential food availability. Thus fish offal and whole fish discarded from whitefish trawlers are a major source of potential food in Shetland but not at St Kilda. Associated with this, previous studies have reported broad differences in diets and colony attendance patterns of adults at these two colonies, and have predicted better chick growth in Shetland than at St Kilda. More detailed information on differences between sites in the foraging behaviour and ranges of adults and the growth of chicks has not previously been available. This paper, therefore, presents detailed dietary analysis and uses land-based data to determine the durations and potential ranges of foraging trips by adults at the two colonies, feeding on different types of prey. Differences in the growth of nestlings at the two sites are described and explained, in terms of the body maintenance requirements of chicks, caloric density of food and variability in food provisioning rates by adults.

Keywords: procellariiform life histories, seabird-fishery interactions, strategic regulation of body mass


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.